Hi Fanicelynn, below are some question I need answered.? I also attached lecture notes to assist.? Let me know if you have any concern.? I need back by 25 Mar.
After reading this week's lecture notes, answer the following questions:
- 1.What are your reactions to your IAT results?
- 2. Is there anything that surprised you?
- 3. Do you think the unconscious use of stereotypes explain the results?
- 4. Do these results suggest anything about the use of stereotypes when observing and meeting people in everyday interactions?
- 5. Is there anything else from this week's readings and lecture that you'd like to discuss?
Make sure that you answer all of the questions. I find that it helps to insert the question into the response section to ensure that you have completed all of the questions.?Make sure to apply the material to real life and link your comments to the lecture material. Add links to articles that you have found which add to the conversation.
Week 2 ? Lectures Notes: Attribution, Fundamental
Attribution Error, Stereotyping and Self?fulfilling
When we started our class, I asked you to look up your names and their various meanings in the
post your bios discussion forum to determine how closely your name described who you were. It was
a fun exercise but what if your name impacted your success in life? In an article titled "Racial Bias in
Hiring (Links to an external site.)" a study performed by Marianne Bertrand, Associate Professor of
Economics at the University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business, and Sendhil Mullainathan of
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, they found this may indeed be the case.
Mullainathan provides an update and some interesting insights from his perspective on what has or
has not changed since the initial study was performed in his article titled "Racial Bias, Even When We
Have Good Intentions (Links to an external site.)." He also includes several additional studies around
racial bias which are informative.
They performed a study on corporate hiring decisions using resumes that were identical except for
the names of the job candidates. Callback rates to job candidates were different depending on
whether or not the applicant had a Black?sounding name or a White?sounding name. This
discrimination was found across job classifications, whether the job was at a low?skilled janitorial
level, the managerial level or at the high skilled vice presidential level.
Brett Arends, in a 11/4/14 Fortune magazine article titled, "In hiring racial bias is still a problem. But not
always for the reasons you think, (Links to an external site.)" suggests that things have not changed
since the University of Chicago study was performed. Arends describes an updated version of the
Chicago study performed by John Nunley, economic professor at the University of Wisconsin, Adam
Pugh at CUNA Mutual Group in Madison, Wisconsin, Nicholas Romero, an economics professor at
the University of Pennsylvania, and Richard Seals, an economics professor at Auburn University in
Alabama in an attempt to see what kind of job market more recent graduates might face. Sadly, the
results were the same. Nunley indicates "Young African?Americans still face persistent
discrimination in the job market, and it is not tied to socioeconomic status, a lack of a degree, or
other factors. Overall, black applicants were invited in for interviews 15.2% of the time, while white
applicants received invitations 18% of the time. To put it another way, African?Americans were 16%
less likely to get called in for an interview."
What do they suggest might be the reason for this discriminatory behavior? Interestingly enough the
type of position being hired for had an impact on whether candidates with a Black sounding name
were called back for an interview. Hiring organizations were concerned that their customers might be
prejudiced and be "put off" by seeing a non?White person behind a sales counter and take their
business elsewhere. Yet when the position was for a manager, coordinator, or administrator the
callback rate for African Americans was almost the same as for Whites.
What are we to make of this? How are we to use this information? We all come from different
backgrounds and have different life experiences and levels of exposure to people who are different
from us. The media of television, literature and music also determine the filter through which we
assess others. Everyone has biases, so don't beat yourself up just yet. The question is what do you
do with or about your biases? I would suggest that we use this knowledge to train ourselves and
others not to succumb to them. But first you have to be aware of them. Author Malcolm Gladwell's
book Blink introduces us to the notion that indeed we all assess people, places, and things in the
blink of an eye. It is subconscious, we are not even aware of it and this has ramifications in the
workplace where diversity is sought and valued and in society which is becoming more diverse every
Click here (Links to an external site.) to take the 10 minute Implicit Association Test (IAT) for both
race and gender to determine what your unconscious bias is towards various races and the sexes.
Be prepared to comment in the discussion board.
I frequently have students tell me that they are not prejudiced and yet their IAT scores indicate that
they have certain biases. They take the test again to see of they can change their score the second
or third time around. I have taken this test several times over the years and my scores have never
Videos on stereotyping, self?fulfilling prophecy, ladder of inference, and fundamental
Stereotyping and self?fulfilling prophecy are demonstrated in this 6?minute video:
The Ladder of Inference is demonstrated in this 5?minute video:
This 7?minute video provides information on fundamental attribution error:
Think about an example, either from personal experience or hearsay, in which perception and
attribution played a part. Think about how the concept of fundamental attribution error displayed in
the University of Chicago study and other lecture videos and articles. Does self?fulfilling prophecy
come into play as well? If so how?
We have discussed some of the issues that people who are not White face in the work world. What
issues do women encounter? The U.S. Department of Labor reports that 57% of women 16 years
and over participated in the workforce in 2014 versus 69.2% of men. Yet the non?profit American
Association of University Women (AAUW), indicates that in 2013 full?time, year?round female
workers were paid 78% of what their male counterparts were paid. This gap in earnings is
experienced in nearly every occupation, increases with age, is not reduced by increased education
and exists whether one has children or not. You may find full details on AAUW's study of these issues
can be found here (Links to an external site.) and the U.S. Department of Labor statistics may be found
here. (Links to an external site.)
Clearly women are also experiencing advancement difficulties as well. In a 7/12/12 Center for
American Progress article, "The Top Ten Economic Facts of Diversity in the Workplace (Links to an
external site.)" by Sophia Kerby and Crosby Burns, several benefits of having a diverse workforce
are enumerated. They include greater economic growth, a more qualified workforce, reduced
employee turnover, greater innovation and increased creativity. Kerby and Burns cite a 4/2011,
McKinsey & Company study "Unlocking the full potential in the U.S economy (Links to an external site.)"
by Joanna Barsh and Lareina Yee which indicates "The reasons why women choose to remain at
their current level or move on to another organization?despite their unflagging confidence and
desire to advance?include: lack of role models, exclusion from the informal networks, not having a
sponsor in upper management to create opportunities."
These factors play a role in the lack of people who are not White in organizations as well. Sheryl
Sandberg, COO Facebook, in her 2010 TED Talk titled "Why We Have Too Few Women Leaders (Links
to an external site.)", identified three things women need to do in order to stay in the workforce: 1. Sit
at the table. 2. Make your partner a real partner. 3. Don't leave before you leave.
Attribution theory, the fundamental attribution error, stereotyping and self?fulfilling prophecy all play a
role in how we view ourselves and others. Selective perception, that is selecting the information that
supports one's viewpoint while discounting information that doesn't support that viewpoint, can lead
to problems in the workplace. I look forward to our discussions this week and hearing your thoughts
on these issues.
This question was answered on: Oct 07, 2020
Buy this answer for only: $15
This attachment is locked
We have a ready expert answer for this paper which you can use for in-depth understanding, research editing or paraphrasing. You can buy it or order for a fresh, original and plagiarism-free copy (Deadline assured. Flexible pricing. TurnItIn Report provided)
Pay using PayPal (No PayPal account Required) or your credit card . All your purchases are securely protected by .
About this QuestionSTATUS
Oct 07, 2020EXPERT
GET INSTANT HELP/h4>
We have top-notch tutors who can do your essay/homework for you at a reasonable cost and then you can simply use that essay as a template to build your own arguments.
You can also use these solutions:
- As a reference for in-depth understanding of the subject.
- As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
- For editing and paraphrasing (check your institution's definition of plagiarism and recommended paraphrase).
NEW ASSIGNMENT HELP?
Order New Solution. Quick Turnaround
Click on the button below in order to Order for a New, Original and High-Quality Essay Solutions. New orders are original solutions and precise to your writing instruction requirements. Place a New Order using the button below.
WE GUARANTEE, THAT YOUR PAPER WILL BE WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND WITHIN YOUR SET DEADLINE.